From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: are super-hidden technical blocks required? Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2012 11:16:55 +0200 Message-ID: <873941bsvs.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20120730144259.GA1017@nausicaa.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35547) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sxwwj-00075N-NP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Aug 2012 05:16:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sxwwi-0001Ar-To for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Aug 2012 05:16:25 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com ([209.85.212.177]:57647) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sxwwi-0001An-NI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Aug 2012 05:16:24 -0400 Received: by wibhm11 with SMTP id hm11so609897wib.12 for ; Sun, 05 Aug 2012 02:16:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Ilya Shlyakhter's message of "Sat, 04 Aug 2012 14:10:52 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ilya Shlyakhter Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Ilya, Ilya Shlyakhter writes: > But I don't want to see the timestamps during normal Org usage. What do you think of "hiding" them by having a new face for properties matching a custom regexp? This has the advantage of letting the user decide what to do with such properties: either hiding or highlighting them. This is also easier to implement. -- Bastien