From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IFtCVUddIGBvcmctbG9hZC1ub2Vycm9yLW11c3RzdWZmaXg=?= =?UTF-8?B?wrQgaXMgbm90IGRlZmluZWQsIGludHJvZHVjZWQgYnkgNTQ4NGEzM2I=?= Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 17:12:10 +0100 Message-ID: <8738y6crdx.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87a9sh3tsp.fsf@gmail.com> <87hamprlob.fsf@gmail.com> <11306.1357839845@alphaville> <874niosy6w.fsf@gmail.com> <87txqodgix.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87txqovnv3.fsf@gmail.com> <874niodcry.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87vcb4spxe.fsf@gmail.com> <8738y8n0b2.fsf@gmail.com> <87lic0bpwj.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87hamo7gdk.fsf@gmail.com> <87wqvk9p5f.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87ehhrhpjl.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87sj67d662.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87a9sf1wsl.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87k3rjd51k.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87obgvzlah.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87fw27cybb.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <876232mzmz.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <878v7y8qwx.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87a9seh050.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36895) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tu3gs-0002Gz-8V for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 11:12:16 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tu3gq-0003ba-HI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 11:12:14 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-f171.google.com ([74.125.82.171]:63258) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tu3gq-0003bV-BG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 11:12:12 -0500 Received: by mail-we0-f171.google.com with SMTP id u3so1375508wey.30 for ; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 08:12:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87a9seh050.fsf@Rainer.invalid> (Achim Gratz's message of "Sat, 12 Jan 2013 16:49:31 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Achim Gratz Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Achim Gratz writes: > Please go back to the beginning of the thread and read about Eric's > problem, that's what the patch is trying to solve. Also, sorry to insist, but Eric bumped on a bug you introduced and committed just before the merge with Emacs emacs-24, which is bad. What would help would be a flag like "[exp]" on patches that are really just experimental and for exploration only -- like the ones you just posted. -- Bastien