From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: New exporter, beamer confusion Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 22:48:00 +0100 Message-ID: <8738x7hk33.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20130204063905.GA23614@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> <87wqun5037.fsf@gmail.com> <6207.1360048864@alphaville> <87fw1ashw5.fsf@gmail.com> <878v728fo0.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87ip65mfv5.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwvhkqye.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <8738x8mhkg.fsf@gmail.com> <37646106030B4CA98C6A7717FBD89D50@gmail.com> <87vca4jigj.fsf@gmail.com> <48826909C0A84E91B223EF0A33E7D721@gmail.com> <877gmkgogt.fsf@gmail.com> <87vca4qcfw.fsf@pank.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43578) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3ZQv-0002Nl-2L for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 16:55:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3ZKP-0001gG-2p for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 16:48:39 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com ([209.85.212.173]:33889) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3ZKO-0001fr-QH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 16:48:20 -0500 Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id hq4so127679wib.6 for ; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 13:48:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87vca4qcfw.fsf@pank.eu> (rasmus@gmx.us's message of "Thu, 07 Feb 2013 18:08:19 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Rasmus Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Rasmus writes: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >> If the author is cautious about keywords used (i.e. #+BEAMER: or >> #+LATEX:), it should be possible to export the same document with either >> `beamer' or `latex' back-end. Though, I don't know how much difference >> there would be between the output from `latex' and a Beamer handout >> produced with "article" class. > > > There is an auxiliary package called beamerarticle. It's neat. It's > described in 21.2.1 in the beamer guide v.3.26. And there's an > example in the file conference-ornate-20min.en.tex which is shipped > with beamer. > > Cool with the #+BEAMER. I didn't know about this, but it's super > nice. The other day I was lookking for a replacement to > #+BEAMER_HEADER (I think that was what it was called), which existed > with the 'old' exporter. Does this variable exist in Beamer yet? There is the #+LATEX_HEADER:. Is a keyword specific to Beamer required? It would by symmetric with #+BEAMER: but I have never needed it before. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou