From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: New Exporter BUG/Change in behaviour Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2013 01:07:57 +0200 Message-ID: <8738v3z29e.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87ppy8yl60.fsf@norang.ca> <87hajkx1rv.fsf@gmail.com> <87d2u7wcpt.fsf@gmail.com> <877gkfz4cf.fsf@gmail.com> <874nfjwa33.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35460) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UOcDN-0004LL-Bj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Apr 2013 19:08:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UOcDK-0007xC-4L for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Apr 2013 19:08:05 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:64658) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UOcDJ-0007x5-UT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Apr 2013 19:08:02 -0400 Received: by mail-wg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id z12so4704869wgg.23 for ; Sat, 06 Apr 2013 16:08:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <874nfjwa33.fsf@gmail.com> (Thorsten Jolitz's message of "Sun, 07 Apr 2013 00:47:12 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Thorsten Jolitz Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Thorsten Jolitz writes: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >> No. The "d:" item only applies to regular drawers. >> >> `property-drawer' elements are not among them. Back-ends handle these >> beasts as they see fit (they usually ignore them, as you can tell). > > I actually have a use-case where I would like to export the > property-drawer to ASCII, but that would involve writing new code - no way > to configure it, right? There's no direct option, if that's your question. One possibility is, from `org-export-before-processing-hook', to copy each property drawer into an example block below. But it involves writing a couple lines of code, indeed. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou