From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: [BUG?] New group tag feature matches too much Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 19:23:04 +0200 Message-ID: <8738uv7jev.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <8761zscf0u.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <8761zsuk17.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:32875) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UQhgr-0000PL-Qo for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 13:23:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UQhgm-0001hA-Td for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 13:23:09 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::229]:50608) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UQhgm-0001h5-My for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 13:23:04 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f169.google.com with SMTP id c10so1910650wiw.2 for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:23:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Christian Moe's message of "Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:07:21 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Christian Moe Cc: Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Christian Moe writes: > Right, thanks. I take it that there have to be spaces around the curly > braces too, since the above doesn't work either, but > > #+TAGS: { rock : acdc cure } { pop : abba madonna } > ^^^ ^^^ > > works fine. > > Out of curiosity, I tried the chaining experiment again with > > #+TAGS: { rock : acdc cure } { pop : abba madonna } { music : pop rock } > > and matching for tag "music" gives the same error message: > > Invalid regexp: "Unmatched ( or \\(" > > But that's OK, really, since nested tag groups weren't supposed to work > anyway. Well, the error was not really informative. There is no error now. I mention group tags limitations in the manual: no nested groups, and no group tag within another group tag definition. Thanks again for testing this, -- Bastien