From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jambunathan K Subject: Re: [PATCH] Enable silent visibility cycling Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 17:53:11 +0530 Message-ID: <8738ralowg.fsf@gmail.com> References: <878v158eag.fsf@gmail.com> <87a9lkmfk0.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87txjsgqmy.fsf@gmail.com> <87oba0gpon.fsf@gmail.com> <87k3kogpgd.fsf@gmail.com> <874nbqgbti.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87mwpiahjf.fsf_-_@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60936) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V09gr-0001OF-Ha for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 08:21:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V09gq-0004fH-M6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 08:21:41 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-x22c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22c]:52517) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V09gq-0004er-F7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 08:21:40 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id lj1so4367847pab.31 for ; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 05:21:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87mwpiahjf.fsf_-_@gmail.com> (Thorsten Jolitz's message of "Fri, 19 Jul 2013 13:57:40 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Thorsten Jolitz Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org [I have no specific opinions on this patch.] The customary way is to put each message at different level. The threshold level that the user wishes to see is configurable. Any logging message that falls below or above that threshold gets filtered. This way you don't introduce switches on a case-by-case basis. No different from verbosity switches of some command lines or the log levels defined by `lwarn' etc. In the present case, you can make cycling messages at "newbie level". An "intermediate" or an "expert user" will not see those. What constitutes a level could ofcourse be defined differently ...