From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jambunathan K Subject: Re: Standardize #+BIBLIOGRAPHY line Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 01:03:09 +0530 Message-ID: <8738r6tmoa.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87k3kjyr37.fsf@gmail.com> <87hafn55l0.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip02wx96.fsf@gmail.com> <874nbm67rq.fsf@gmail.com> <874nbmwvsy.fsf@gmail.com> <87y58y4ryh.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40615) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1Lph-0004YP-MF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 15:31:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1Lpg-0007SB-Vd for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 15:31:45 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-x22e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22e]:42879) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1Lpg-0007Rw-Oz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 15:31:44 -0400 Received: by mail-pb0-f46.google.com with SMTP id rq2so7412336pbb.5 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 12:31:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87y58y4ryh.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Mon, 22 Jul 2013 15:58:14 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > before discussing (again) citations syntax I understand that talking about citations syntax will lead to bike-shedding. Every one - including me - seem to have an (un)informed opinion of it. The intent of the mail - as the subject - says is to 1. To standardize the in buffer syntax for Bibliography based on existing implementations. 2. To check your interest in "faking" a citation-reference object. This is a programmatic interface as opposed to a specific Org syntax. > we must ensure that this is a realistic goal. It is, unless we want the whole earth and sky.