From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: link interfering with brackets when abbreviated Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 20:02:51 +0100 Message-ID: <8738j5snms.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87ppm9sxoh.fsf@gmail.com> <87lhwxswby.fsf@gmail.com> <87ha7lsu5o.fsf@gmail.com> <8761o1n63t.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53147) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WIjkZ-0007v6-OA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:02:40 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WIjkT-0004mI-GI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:02:35 -0500 In-Reply-To: <8761o1n63t.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (Bastien's message of "Wed, 26 Feb 2014 18:20:22 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: Michael Brand , Org Mode Hello, Bastien writes: > Count me in -- this is a regression that needs to be fixed. > > Nicolas, any stronger objection than the one your already > expressed? As I said, the "end of line" is not a structural unit. Implementing that "feature", which, I must admit, I find cheesy, back will be fragile and confusing. For example, white spaces after an object still belong to an object. So in the following case: [[http://orgmode.org]] [[http://duckduckgo.com]] using C-c C-o between the two links will open the first one, but there: [[http://orgmode.org]] and [[http://duckduckgo.com]] C-c C-o on the "and" will open the second one. Also in the following example: [fn:1] This is some text [[http://orgmode.org]] C-c C-o on "some" currently triggers `org-footnote-action' since point is in a footnote definition. But with the behaviour you describe, it would be hard to predict whether it should move to the link or still open the footnote. There are many other examples. This "convenient feature" is unpredictable and not worth implementing back (not counting the fact that it wouldn't be totally trivial to do properly). Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou