From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Trouble with Tables and Python Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 18:46:18 -0400 Message-ID: <8738he9pol.fsf@alphaville.bos.redhat.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35669) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WaC7p-00011f-Jx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 18:46:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WaC7h-0002sK-VG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 18:46:45 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:43433) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WaC7h-0002rf-Oe for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 18:46:37 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WaC7f-0006ph-Rd for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 00:46:35 +0200 Received: from nat-pool-bos-t.redhat.com ([66.187.233.206]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 00:46:35 +0200 Received: from ndokos by nat-pool-bos-t.redhat.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 00:46:35 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Martin Schöön writes: > ... Let's move over to the third example file and the real > mystery. This all my own code. Reading data from the first table works > just fine and the same goes for the calculations. The output table, > however, is different from that of example 2. The 'wrapper' is gone > but each row is starting with ": ". Where does that come from? Why > does it differ from example 2? If my results differ from someone > else's (different install/versions etc) -- OK. But how can I get > differences like this on my own? To my  un-trained eyes the print > statements of examples 2 and 3 look very similar. (But, the first > things that go blind are the eyes... probably something blatantly > obvious once pointed out to me.) > 2) and 3) are exactly the same thing (see section 11.3, "Literal examples" in the org manual.) The only difference is the length of the output - short output is prepended by a colon, long output is wrapped in #+BEGIN_EXAMPLE/#+END_EXAMPLE. What is short and what is long is determined by the value of org-babel-min-lines-for-block-output (default: 10) which you can customize. -- Nick