From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>
Subject: Re: Target and link text normalised to `orgtargetn'
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 10:55:50 +0200
Message-ID: <87383vqiuh.fsf@gmx.us>
References: <20150414092530.GC2957@chitra.no-ip.org>
	<20150414120852.GD2957@chitra.no-ip.org> <87zj699ez9.fsf@gmx.us>
	<20150416001830.GC14328@chitra.no-ip.org> <87egnk9ycz.fsf@gmx.us>
	<87k2x9cddu.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<20150419121305.GZ14328@chitra.no-ip.org>
	<87618smg2i.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87d230rzak.fsf@gmx.us>
	<87vbgsdw2c.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87pp70qi9w.fsf@gmx.us>
	<87oamkdu5v.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87lhhoqbsc.fsf@gmx.us>
	<87fv7wdkz2.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42310)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rasmus@gmx.us>) id 1Yk7Uk-0008C2-UB
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 04:55:59 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rasmus@gmx.us>) id 1Yk7Uf-0000hA-VT
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 04:55:58 -0400
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:50930)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rasmus@gmx.us>) id 1Yk7Uf-0000gy-KW
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 04:55:53 -0400
Received: from x200s ([91.64.37.213]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA
	(Nemesis) id 0MTjua-1YsxDM2BkW-00QSkc for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>;
	Mon, 20 Apr 2015 10:55:52 +0200
In-Reply-To: <87fv7wdkz2.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of
	"Sun, 19 Apr 2015 20:36:01 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:

> Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:
>
>> That's what I meant.  Or rather a wrapper like org-latex--label.  A
>> mapping like the one that was reverted for ox-latex only.  Or are there
>> pitfalls in that approach?
>
> It will not give you predictability either since you cannot guess "4" in
> "sec:4".

That's fine.

> Also, it is dangerous since a user could use \label{sec:4} for something
> different.

So we could replace ^org with a mapping, e.g. "headline" =E2=86=92 "sec:" a=
nd
"table" =E2=86=92 "tab:".  Then there's the added safety of TYPE-NUMBER and=
 the
expected prefix.

> What is the real benefit of "sec:4" over "orgheadline4"? Aesthetics?

Mostly aesthetics.  "sec:4" is expected, though I have no numbers to back
this claim.

I would expect breakage following the change to be pretty rare, but one
example of breakage is fancyref:

    \documentclass{article}
    \usepackage{fancyref}
    \begin{document}
    \section{h1}
    \label{sec:h1}
    \section{h2}
    \label{orgheading2}
    See \fref{sec:h1} and \fref{orgheading2}
    \end{document}

>> It does not IMO. I would rather not label sections manually.
>
> I don't understand that part. Would you mind elaborating a bit?

Given my taste for "standard" prefixes, I would rather not have to label
every section with some custom id to get a standard prefix in the output.

=E2=80=94Rasmus

--=20
I almost cut my hair, it happened just the other day