From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com>
Subject: Re: isearch-forward at end of entry
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 22:33:28 -0500
Message-ID: <8737tva7ef.fsf@kyleam.com>
References: <CALn3zogcb0ircWht6tqQHPOGO2L9j9uBwA5fuT=7j-fBz0psKA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46683)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kyle@kyleam.com>) id 1aL0ZX-0002Og-Gx
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 22:33:40 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kyle@kyleam.com>) id 1aL0ZU-0005AZ-BZ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 22:33:39 -0500
Received: from pb-smtp0.int.icgroup.com ([208.72.237.35]:57538
	helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kyle@kyleam.com>) id 1aL0ZU-0005AS-54
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 22:33:36 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CALn3zogcb0ircWht6tqQHPOGO2L9j9uBwA5fuT=7j-fBz0psKA@mail.gmail.com>
	(Michael Brand's message of "Sat, 2 Jan 2016 12:18:50 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Michael Brand <michael.ch.brand@gmail.com>
Cc: Org Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Michael Brand <michael.ch.brand@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi all
>
> With today's release_8.3.2-441-ga87dea3 on Emacs 24.5 and this org
> file
>
> --------------------
> * d
>   - e
>   - f
> * g
> --------------------
>
> when d is folded: After "M-< C-s f RET" the entry d is folded but I
> expect it to remain unfolded like after "M-< C-s e RET". Am I doing
> something wrong?

I'm not able to reproduce this with the commit you mentioned or with the
current master (531985d).  Are you still seeing this issue?

-- 
Kyle