From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sanel Zukan <sanelz@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Clocking without timestamp
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 11:56:58 +0200
Message-ID: <8737n7p8ut.fsf@darkstar.example.net>
References: <877fcopibb.fsf@darkstar.example.net>
	<87wpkkhafc.fsf@saiph.selenimh>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40883)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <sanelz@gmail.com>) id 1bP5IZ-0006A1-SR
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 05:57:16 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <sanelz@gmail.com>) id 1bP5IV-0003m5-MZ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 05:57:14 -0400
Received: from mail-wm0-x22a.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::22a]:36998)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <sanelz@gmail.com>) id 1bP5IV-0003ly-Eu
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 05:57:11 -0400
Received: by mail-wm0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id i5so108481163wmg.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 02:57:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87wpkkhafc.fsf@saiph.selenimh>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
> This syntax isn't valid. Actually it is rather unexpected that it was
> producing something meaningful before.
>
> CLOCK lines require at least a time-stamp.

Didn't know about this. Thanks!

> Regards,
>
> --=20
> Nicolas Goaziou

Best,
Sanel

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJXjKfxAAoJEEGRMsiChULza48H/0RkMzA5fOJy4v93p42ndsUD
1itCrpq9WO/soxrsSgfIREwG31r1DNRcSOyoo5SXYPnfyoqaQ9Z7Nz+gwHAkZBYd
znM0YVqeJ7KSqaiJolc7mrsot+KZw6IewlHaeHzVZzf1KpaCfU9nTOH7jk0aDxo7
IrGOPhAr926AMUFS5HoM9Yd5icRzSSpzkzh5aD3RUTYSTmvliOp9uTnyMLQP7JIY
BXqatUJM6s0ZUmHS97eLpPrhhvq7uxKa34WapIiP/BGLZvJFZdTSoAOrVfD/LJCN
ZHUKp1BB39DdXKwKp1BuZboNspK6nklecM1iGKCSq8ReRTABswROdV00b/2YSZs=
=5sZ5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--