From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: links-9.0 v3 Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 13:48:55 +0200 Message-ID: <8737n7go9k.fsf@saiph.selenimh> References: <87oa6afmeu.fsf@saiph.selenimh> <87k2gxg8qm.fsf@saiph.selenimh> <8737nlfqdv.fsf@saiph.selenimh> <87y45bvm12.fsf@saiph.selenimh> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33209) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bP72h-00050Q-T8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 07:49:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bP72f-0001Xv-V2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 07:48:58 -0400 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:43799) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bP72f-0001Xh-PZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 07:48:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: (John Kitchin's message of "Thu, 14 Jul 2016 21:12:50 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: John Kitchin Cc: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" Hello, John Kitchin writes: > Here are my current suggestions for the org-link 9.0. Thank you. > Let me know what the best way to send these might be. It looks like it > might be 21 patches right now. AFAIU, many among them introduce code that no longer exists in the final draft. It would be nice to make them disappear, using interactive rebasing, as suggested earlier in this thread. If that's not possible, just send them over here, I'll apply them. BTW sent patch doesn't seem to include an option handler. Am I missing something? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou