From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [RFC] The "c" Org macro Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 18:10:59 +0200 Message-ID: <8737ce3t9o.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <2ee94a64a94b46259b0da6e7d34675c9@HE1PR01MB1898.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com> <87y3u7o3dj.fsf@t3610> <87pofjtk4b.fsf@t3610> <87bmr35lzs.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87y3u6l1at.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47341) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d87j4-0003V8-31 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 09 May 2017 12:11:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d87j3-0006nO-AQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 09 May 2017 12:11:02 -0400 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:43177) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d87j3-0006kb-3O for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 09 May 2017 12:11:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87y3u6l1at.fsf@gmx.us> (rasmus@gmx.us's message of "Tue, 09 May 2017 13:25:30 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Rasmus Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Rasmus writes: > Seems fine. To me, "n" or "N" would be a better name for the macro, as > that suggests some sort of number, whereas "c" doesn=E2=80=99t really ass= ociated > with "counter" to me. Perhaps it=E2=80=99s just because the syntax looks= a lot > like the R combine command... "n" seems better indeed. Not sure about "N" > Are there a lot of cases where it would not be able to just configure how > heading numbers are printed in the backend? I don't know there are a lot of cases, but there are definitely some: * Definition * Property * Example 1 * Property * Example 2 then you realize you want to demonstrate the second property before the first one... Regards, --=20 Nicolas Goaziou