From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: Do not inherit unnumbered property: help needed
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 23:09:55 +0100
Message-ID: <87375cv9os.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <87375dazkk.fsf@gmail.com>
	<CAFyQvY1Svps9vnH4+O8QMo7QQUqRHaPaJTsb=vsi6jrHUQVrPg@mail.gmail.com>
	<87zi7l9ee7.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35561)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1eFopk-0008T6-LC
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 17:10:01 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1eFopj-0005sr-Rb
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 17:10:00 -0500
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:51819)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>)
	id 1eFopj-0005oG-LG
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 17:09:59 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87zi7l9ee7.fsf@gmail.com> (Akater's message of "Fri, 17 Nov 2017
	14:19:12 +0000")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Akater <nuclearspace@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-org list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, Kaushal Modi <kaushal.modi@gmail.com>

Hello,

Akater <nuclearspace@gmail.com> writes:

> In case UNNUMBERED's inheritance could be turned off by a standard
> procedure, my other points are meaningless. So let's first figure out if
> it could.

It cannot. That's a feature intended to preserve sanity.

As suggested, you could write an export back-end that ignore UNNUMBERED
inheritance.

OOC, what is the output you expect from your initial example?

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou