From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Gaspard Subject: Re: [feature] Handle recurrence in <> and [] dates Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2018 21:34:26 +0900 Message-ID: <8736segzal.fsf@llwynog.ekleog.org> References: <87tvldzzn8.fsf@llwynog.ekleog.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49349) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gK0lC-0004lB-Ar for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2018 07:47:14 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gK0Z2-0000tK-Nl for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2018 07:34:39 -0500 Received: from grym.ekleog.org ([94.23.42.210]:47688 helo=smtp.gaspard.ninja) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gK0Z1-0000mr-KF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2018 07:34:35 -0500 Received: by smtp.gaspard.ninja (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 4bebfd6b for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 12:34:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.gaspard.ninja (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 0167eadd for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 12:34:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (llwynog [local]) by llwynog (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 4a122479 for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 12:34:27 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <87tvldzzn8.fsf@llwynog.ekleog.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello all! It's been ~2 weeks so I hope you'll forgive me bumping my post :) Do you have an opinion about this idea? Cheers, Leo Leo Gaspard writes: > Hello all! > > I have been using org-mode for a few days (switching over from > todo.txt=C2=A0[1]), and for the time being my experience has been great! > > There is a single thing I found weird up to now: it seems that > recurrence tags in <> and [] =E2=80=9Ctags=E2=80=9D don't get bumped when= a task is > completed and has a recurrence set in its SCHEDULED or DEADLINE date. > > The reason I'd like this is because I have monthly bank statements, > which come in the next month, and I'd like to store the bank statement's > date in a [] =E2=80=9Ctag=E2=80=9D so that I can easily know which statem= ent I'm > supposed to handle, even though this date is neither a SCHEDULED (as I > don't have the statement yet at the date it's produced) nor a DEADLINE > (for the same reason). > > What do you think about this? > > Anyway, thanks a lot for the great work! > > Cheers, > Leo > > > [1] http://todotxt.org/