Re: [feature] Handle recurrence in <> and [] dates

[Leo Gaspard <orgmode@leo.gaspard.io>]

Hello all!

It's been ~2 weeks so I hope you'll forgive me bumping my post :)

Do you have an opinion about this idea?
Cheers,
  Leo

Leo Gaspard <orgmode@leo.gaspard.io> writes:

> Hello all!
>
> I have been using org-mode for a few days (switching over from
> todo.txt [1]), and for the time being my experience has been great!
>
> There is a single thing I found weird up to now: it seems that
> recurrence tags in <> and [] “tags” don't get bumped when a task is
> completed and has a recurrence set in its SCHEDULED or DEADLINE date.
>
> The reason I'd like this is because I have monthly bank statements,
> which come in the next month, and I'd like to store the bank statement's
> date in a [] “tag” so that I can easily know which statement I'm
> supposed to handle, even though this date is neither a SCHEDULED (as I
> don't have the statement yet at the date it's produced) nor a DEADLINE
> (for the same reason).
>
> What do you think about this?
>
> Anyway, thanks a lot for the great work!
>
> Cheers,
>   Leo
>
>
> [1] http://todotxt.org/