From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Bug: Org 9.3 table columnwidth directive not working [9.3 (release_9.3 @ /Applications/Emacs.app/Contents/Resources/lisp/org/)] Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2019 09:24:16 +0100 Message-ID: <8736dvuswf.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <0100016ed1d37aac-88e8671f-bb77-434f-a756-35131ada48db-000000@email.amazonses.com> <87lfrsc8zj.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <0100016ed4392587-b1efb2eb-f2d2-49d2-b77c-572deb0fff17-000000@email.amazonses.com> <87eexjgx30.fsf@kyleam.com> <87k179w5n3.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <86o8wkgk6k.fsf@gmail.com> <87d0d0uhlh.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <86wob7dcxm.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49246) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1idrrj-0004su-VR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Dec 2019 03:24:36 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1idrrh-00013u-Vz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Dec 2019 03:24:31 -0500 Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.198]:47713) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1idrrg-00011A-Ql for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Dec 2019 03:24:29 -0500 In-Reply-To: <86wob7dcxm.fsf@gmail.com> (Andy Moreton's message of "Sat, 07 Dec 2019 21:48:53 +0000") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Andy Moreton Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Andy Moreton writes: > It also always shows the shrink/expend overlay, even if that is not > desired. Why is it not desired? Are you talking about the "=E2=80=A6" or the whole overlay, including the spaces? > I find it visually intrusive, and the extra character > introduces a new misalignment. I do not notice any misalignment, unless I type in the column, in which case, I realign it the usual way, e.g., with TAB. Could you show an ECM? > While everyone has their own preferences, developers should not impose > their preferences on users, who may decide to make different choices. If you read the initial thread, you will notice that I asked for feedback during the development of the feature. I also integrated suggestions. As a developer, I cannot do more. In any case, I did not impose this on anyone. We're going nowhere with your remark. > The dynamic shrink feature added a new capability that many will find > useful, but it also removed the ability to do things the older and > simpler way. I don't know. You still have to point out what "things" you are talking about. So far, you only expressed your dislike of the change. I think I got it already. > It should have been added as an option, so either static or dynamic > behaviour can be selected by the user. I didn't think so two years ago, when I implemented this, and I still don't think so. Regards, --=20 Nicolas Goaziou