From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id kOsZBh59wl4dRgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 18 May 2020 12:18:38 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id wPTGAR59wl71fwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 18 May 2020 12:18:38 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89601940146 for ; Mon, 18 May 2020 12:18:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:40484 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jaej6-0001Y4-GP for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 18 May 2020 08:18:36 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47912) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jaeiT-0001Xh-V5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2020 08:17:57 -0400 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:56083) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jaeiS-0006Bb-Ht for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2020 08:17:57 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68C1A16005F for ; Mon, 18 May 2020 14:17:53 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1589804273; bh=3sIMQDUj22faFP7mZWqQWOQm8hCAigvFdaZAMANwBlQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:CC:Date:From; b=QVE3UwPdYfHvW2z3RZDTdRBSCdRGyI4OI+GsVHNC8C2IdZHtAyFBfZO8Zod1LcFN6 JGuBLo6BPbwqi3aRc/VEV898hW/h+ZzaF95giWSiVwfIa32zKPfy5R4Vdn51z4EbUd LyLMQljJnHyavjO/GqXAQ8V/qeibm1kZYkJXHlGtbEOnx6DSDb4BmgXMQh0JhYiMK/ tO3DoeajSiZsNv9A+B1XrODLIdayqJuBpZAhyt3N0kSGf0Wtycp41UdgG74tQa4JSQ A2wYXEvtAbWcq45vQmxXxyoLsSft1LftNK3cKHx3hL+odpY/Kc9s+VOemSIaASM81h ooc4NFfa1CNzw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 49QdM427P8z9rxM; Mon, 18 May 2020 14:17:52 +0200 (CEST) From: George Sokolsky To: kyle@kyleam.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] agenda: Consider FILETAGS for archive skipping In-Reply-To: <87a725ea5s.fsf@bzg.fr> (message from Bastien on Mon, 18 May 2020 13:48:31 +0200) Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 14:17:51 +0200 Message-ID: <87367xmo7k.fsf@posteo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=sokolgeo@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/18 05:34:21 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: sokolgeo@posteo.net, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=QVE3UwPd; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (strict)" header.from=posteo.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.09 X-TUID: 3C0XpnEHFelc Kyle, could you please apply the patch to the org repository? Thank you George Bastien writes: > Hi George, > > George Sokolsky writes: > >> For avoidance of doubt - this is Kyle's patch, not mine (thank you >> Kyle!) > > Sorry for the confusion, I thought you were asking for permission to > commit the patch directly yourself. Kyle can of course apply it when > he wants. > >> Bastien, do you mean that this patch will be in the next weekly org >> build on melpa? > > If the patch gets applied soon, it will be available on the Org ELPA > package. I don't know about MELPA. > > Best,