From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 0t8AEoCPy1+wQgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 13:47:44 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id s2BkDYCPy1+PEwAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 13:47:44 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 983939403CA for ; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 13:47:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:44570 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1klXuX-0007R8-NI for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 08:47:41 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45112) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1klXu8-0007Op-BJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 08:47:16 -0500 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:36448) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1klXu6-00083h-3Q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 08:47:16 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E74A160063 for ; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 14:47:10 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1607176030; bh=2he8BiGVqiYe97B5m8bczVHyG/ZW9YvFn/Z+GQuGOl8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=QVi9HKWRW7MhEoAO4dr/oUbW3EAyTvPnwQrM0B12d596TP1is6yFcW1zIOBlfe6xI uyFoUcoIn+bZjggUwW/N0a42ExhyzohGZ3coM2yy396mqeBYBCUNHA5t1NGkVvI5pL V+EQ0CdHrBkYp1eekoA90DpWEtFnDoizJeDIRavHftxw/8A21exnTrpE5W/Ray0hMf 5TIJK55mYXkz5OKeGCI2N6KUwyh5+1xG1XIm+37938lOJ5pOQGsBEY50qFG3LWzL6b cXRjJijswhZyrtMfp83BJNtYg1bSTbhVb3ALgI++/WwqSH4O5qxc0pdFm9RR/go4VM G+wFJvrAwQKQw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4Cp9qK2MRFz6tmH; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 14:47:09 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Juan_Manuel_Mac=C3=ADas?= To: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Footnote definition within a verse block has spurious line breaks when exported to LaTeX References: <87sg8prant.fsf@posteo.net> <87360kpqkd.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2020 14:47:08 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87360kpqkd.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Sat, 05 Dec 2020 10:09:22 +0100") Message-ID: <87360ks6ub.fsf@posteo.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=maciaschain@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: orgmode Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.00 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=QVi9HKWR; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 983939403CA X-Spam-Score: -3.00 X-Migadu-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu X-TUID: 6Bz4quDbZVC4 Hello, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > This is hopefully fixed in master branch. Let me knows if it works for > you. Thank you, Nicolas. I've tried it and it works perfectly. I see that \footnotemark\footnotetext is used now, same as in tables. I think it's a great solution. Best, Juan Manuel