From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id OFBuLM4X4F8iHQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 03:34:38 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id yGs/KM4X4F9MfAAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 03:34:38 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D34C940142 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 03:34:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:41336 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1krBy0-0004Wf-FK for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 22:34:36 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35848) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1krBxd-0004WU-2s for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 22:34:13 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-x52f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::52f]:44481) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1krBxb-00020V-Ie for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 22:34:12 -0500 Received: by mail-pg1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id p18so5523146pgm.11 for ; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 19:34:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=/VIz9HSPKW8JPKdPbxYCn4D/1IOiVCItUHDcu/voHwM=; b=e7zemge+hk/bhjoDp08az8tPLSrJu1L4dXwuQ+ksM0IPo/S/21EcHlAHQ2IvYHhU4H QDsWKHtZ1ii2EDGILKgqf1t4llYEbzmItHBbEW+yrp0CqsQFhfRlClXbSQd7QPs8LVMJ 7BNklTwO8IgoBfSoajZh/F0tH5ahQ47xSyiO8eTzyzazQcQjZeQzX21e7FSFhVEWADR+ X2TdbkHaxd6GBxZ+vnbJ+Hcelw0xegVxc/ybxDHj/NYE2rVcYAjIq7Miih6GwKn3PXJj VQfWr5IFbWu333ZdQ2l4X6Ayx2murfmfKNEIiReY8d5GTIsd8UbPtOOADTuajzjtoAD4 2X4A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=/VIz9HSPKW8JPKdPbxYCn4D/1IOiVCItUHDcu/voHwM=; b=BzHqWTLHvdN06hEPij5uDLlZvEimgRZ/uoaVBM+mznaoJykxu/2bB1Y+ADYF20cgqI r6YQ9ERURWNuL5wqwH79JOEPfpc9b1zmh+sT0nIxdgXRB5n8004mgNFLe04qjAlpcm+O 9w7auzvDbKEQZ1KCdanbeFbDlBofCSPgI3O7LhNArLMEFRlZXPNqw4NGzxLfGvPLjoX0 76/vZQ4EGevIQyRAomRVJXzDEFaeceMopNFkrWZwr0/kZWYwj6cn0oFvjTzp4eG33mWy i/NMbcUctL7CjrMHcxP0VKnOXFv/By6gvA/XN8XzIhiCQ6Lo9K3lGrXo+rE6LJOTQ4Ye OIJg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532WQjK9Yw7vVGY5V4WVBTtMD/fKF1y3P2PP7A1PeHSTFAJWSC1d QqWbcN7xROiUIBRawy4JcujnHUbAO8Gw8Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwy9ZPVpH603296+JVBvMUAy/czXL+J3g2umG0/hkZaHG6EstRJZYefNU9sYpJuSKGKPsNtbg== X-Received: by 2002:a63:ea49:: with SMTP id l9mr9474045pgk.257.1608521649833; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 19:34:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([50.7.251.66]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q15sm3490381pgk.11.2020.12.20.19.34.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 20 Dec 2020 19:34:09 -0800 (PST) From: Ihor Radchenko To: "Victor A. Stoichita" , emacs-orgmode Subject: Re: strange behavior of @ in tag searches In-Reply-To: <87pn34rscc.fsf@svictor.net> References: <87mty89kvy.fsf@svictor.net> <87pn34rscc.fsf@svictor.net> X-Woof-Bug: confirmed Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 11:38:04 +0800 Message-ID: <8735zz4yn7.fsf@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::52f; envelope-from=yantar92@gmail.com; helo=mail-pg1-x52f.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.52 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=e7zemge+; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 1D34C940142 X-Spam-Score: -2.52 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: tB56WOamg8HQ "Victor A. Stoichita" writes: > I just realized that with "emacs -Q" both searches yield the > expected results. > I have emacs 27.1 which ships org-mode 9.3. > Could I have set inadvertently something that changes the meaning > of @ in tag searches? Or was there a change in that respect > between 9.3 and 9.4.3? I can reproduce your first recipe on master. However, I simply get no results on the second recipe (which also should not happen). For future, to test with custom Org version, you can run emacs like emacs -Q -L /path/to/your/org-mode/folder/lisp -l org Best, Ihor