Re: [PATCH] ox-latex.el: fix interpretation of org-latex-pdf-process

[Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com>]

Tara Lorenz writes:

> Hi all,
>
> it seems that the documentation and code for `org-latex-pdf-process' are
> out of sync: Where the documentation mentions "%bib" the code expects
> "%bibtex".  At least, that's how i understand it.

Thanks for catching that.  It seems [1] it's an old regression from
f6187deca (ox-latex: Small refactor, 2015-09-13).

[1] https://orgmode.org/list/877e8p1aej.fsf@kyleam.com/

> I resolved that confusing situation by making "%bib" and "%bibtex"
> equally accepted, without touching the documentation.  Thus, old
> configurations work again ("%bib") as well as workarounds (using
> "%bibtex") which might have gotten employed somewhere.

That sounds like a good approach to me.  Applied (13e98e2a1), adding a
TINYCHANGE cookie and a reference to the above commit in the message.

> Subject: [PATCH] ox-latex.el: fix interpretation of org-latex-pdf-process
[...]
>  	 (process (if (functionp org-latex-pdf-process) org-latex-pdf-process
> -		    ;; Replace "%latex" and "%bibtex" with,
> +		    ;; Replace "%latex", "%bib" and "%bibtex" with,
>  		    ;; respectively, "%L" and "%B" so as to adhere to
>  		    ;; `format-spec' specifications.

I also tweaked this comment a bit because, with the above change, the
elements before and after "respectively" no longer lined up.