Re: [PATCH] Testing: Add tests for `org-tags-sort-function'

[Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net>]

Morgan Smith <Morgan.J.Smith@outlook.com> writes:

> diff --git a/testing/lisp/test-org-agenda.el b/testing/lisp/test-org-agenda.el
> index 778f91e8e..c1092df3b 100644
> --- a/testing/lisp/test-org-agenda.el
> +++ b/testing/lisp/test-org-agenda.el

Thanks for the patch!

> +        ;; Sorting doesn't care about `org-tag-alist'.  This is only
> +        ;; here for later when we add sorting methods that do
> ....

Then, please refrain from setting alist in this patch and add it later,
when testing the relevant methods.

> +    (org-test-agenda-with-agenda
> +     (string-join
> +      '("* TODO group_a :group_a:"
> +        "* TODO tag_a_1 :tag_a_1:"
> +        "* TODO tag_a_2 :tag_a_2:"
> +        "* TODO tag_b_1 :tag_b_1:"
> +        "* TODO tag_b_2 :tag_b_2:"
> +        "* TODO groupless :groupless:"
> +        "* TODO lonely :lonely:")
> +      "\n")
> +     (dolist (org-tags-sort-function '(nil org-string< org-string>))
> +       (should
> +        (string-equal
> +         (progn
> +           (org-agenda nil "f")
> +           (substring-no-properties (buffer-string)))
> +         (pcase org-tags-sort-function
> +           ;; TODO: a value of `nil' sorts it!  That's not what the
> +           ;; customize menu of `org-tags-sort-function' says!  It
> +           ;; says "No sorting".

Right. When sort function is not set agenda specifically (but not other
users of org-tags-sort-function) falls back to alphabetical sorting.

In fact, the docstring does not at all mention that
`org-tags-sort-function' is honored at all:

  (defcustom org-agenda-sorting-strategy ...
    ...
    tag-up             Sort alphabetically by last tag, A-Z.
    tag-down           Sort alphabetically by last tag, Z-A.

We need to fix this docstring documenting `org-tags-sort-function', I think. 

> +           ((or 'nil 'org-string<)
> +            "group_a\ngroupless\nlonely\ntag_a_1\ntag_a_2\ntag_b_1\ntag_b_2\n")
> +           ('org-string>
> +            "tag_b_2\ntag_b_1\ntag_a_2\ntag_a_1\nlonely\ngroupless\ngroup_a\n"))))))))

Nitpick: it would be more readable to use `string-join' here as well.

-- 
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>