Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> writes:

> Before I continue with my replies, I'd like to add one general comment.
>
> You are suggesting a number of new diverse features.
> Ideally, it is better to discuss and add them separately.
> Especially, when we move ahead and discuss the concrete implementations
> or patches.
>
> I will also provide some links to existing discussions on similar
> features. It is a good idea to continue those discussions, so that we do
> not spread things across the mailing list too much.
>
> Sébastien Gendre <seb@k-7.ch> writes:

It's a good idea.

I have created a first thread to discuss the local search engine here:
https://list.orgmode.org/87a5ev31ul.fsf@k-7.ch/T/#u



> Let me clarify.
> Unless an indexer is very simple, we do not really want it in Org - it
> will put a lot of extra load on maintainers.
>
> On the other side, we do not want to tie things to some project that
> may fade out in 10 years into the future.
>
> The way I see search engine support in Org mode is either:
>
> 1. Using some really established project that we can expect to last for
>    many years.
>
> 2. Implementing pluggable search support where users can choose which
>    indexer/searcher to use
>
> (2) will be the best.
>
> So, may you please search across available search engines and see what
> they have in common. Then, we can work out some infrastructure that is
> generic enough to plug a custom engine.
>
> Then, pagefind can be the default (it is MIT license - GPL compatible),
> unless someone proposes a better alternative.

I have replied to this part on my first reply to the thread about the
search engine, at "Remarks #1":
https://list.orgmode.org/878quf1ji0.fsf@k-7.ch/T/#m2425dcfc7665e88aefcbd81800d2d83aef98cd5b


For the other parts, I have take notes of your replies and will reply on
the specific threads.

Thank you very much for all your replies. :)


Best regards

-------
Gendre Sébastien