From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Guerry Subject: Re: export-html, close the .html file Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:10:52 +0000 Message-ID: <871w6vbh9f.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <871w6w2eis.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87zltjwm5h.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <47C86BF2.50204@cornell.edu> <87od9zwkpk.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <47C8729C.2000907@cornell.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JVCVR-0002He-UZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:11:02 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JVCVP-0002Fq-80 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:11:00 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JVCVO-0002FN-Lm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:10:58 -0500 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.175]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JVCVO-0001Mp-Id for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:10:58 -0500 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id a2so510831ugf.48 for ; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:10:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <47C8729C.2000907@cornell.edu> (Xin Shi's message of "Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:01:16 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Xin Shi Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Xin Shi writes: > Not really. That one is export to temporary buffer. What I want is when > org-export-html, is just do the work at the background, without open the > .html in one of Emacs' buffer. Sorry I misunderstood your question, because exporting to HTML does not open the result in the current buffer, unless you explicitly export to a temporary buffer. What you want exactly is that all export buffers should be cleaned up after expor -- am I right? I so, I agree, and will fix this. -- Bastien