From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: david@adboyd.com (J. David Boyd) Subject: Re: void variable Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 10:02:32 -0500 Message-ID: <871w53b3zr.fsf@adboyd.com> References: <87ej94i7ej.fsf@adboyd.com> <822808F3-1A5E-449E-9C2C-6E41580503FF@science.uva.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jms73-0005aM-7c for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:02:53 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jms6z-0005Ya-Du for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:02:52 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jms6z-0005YX-AS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:02:49 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jms6y-0004EK-7f for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:02:49 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Jms6o-0007EF-VQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:02:40 +0000 Received: from 72.186.72.129 ([72.186.72.129]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:02:38 +0000 Received: from david by 72.186.72.129 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:02:38 +0000 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Well, when I removed the .elc files, so I could attempt to debug it, it worked fine. Maybe I'll recompile, and maybe I'll just leave it alone. It works fast enough for me without being compiled. Maybe I had an old .elc file that never got overwritten. Whatever, sorry for the false alarm. Dave Carsten Dominik writes: > I cannot reproduce this. > > What is your emacs version??? > > - Carsten