From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?Q?S=C3=A9bastien_Vauban?= Subject: Re: POLL: Change of keys to move agenda through time Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:10:47 +0200 Message-ID: <871vn0szd4.fsf@mundaneum.com> References: <87skfgxn0f.fsf@gmail.com> <87vdkduo9s.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87ocq4xgxd.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Hi all, Carsten Dominik wrote: > I tend to agree with the arguments that "n" and "p" should move vertically > in the agenda buffer, because many Emacs modes do it like this. > > So it seem to me that this discussion should focus on which keys should m= ove > the agenda forward and backward in time. >From my current knowledge of Emacs modes (using dired, Gnus, a bit of w3m, = and the like), yes, I would definitely tend to reserve `n' (next) and `p' (previous) for vertical movements. For horizontal ones, the common use goes for `b' (backward) and `f' (forwar= d). At least, if not the letters alone, combinations of those letters (like prefixing them with Control or Meta or ...). See (info "(emacs)Moving Point") or section 7.2 of the Emacs manual. Best regards, Seb --=20 S=C3=A9bastien Vauban _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode