From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Rose Subject: Re: org-html link building diff Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 14:26:35 +0200 Message-ID: <871vd9s8ec.fsf@gmx.de> References: <047c96c5361a8739fc4e8bb94abeef8e.squirrel@mail.panix.com> <9D0A8669-60C2-462F-8235-881573A664D6@gmail.com> <45F35E60-E0C4-4FF3-BBC4-F55F0B39BD90@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41536 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OELse-0005nB-6z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 08:26:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OELsc-000379-9d for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 08:26:40 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:55648) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OELsb-00036V-UW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 08:26:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <45F35E60-E0C4-4FF3-BBC4-F55F0B39BD90@gmail.com> (Carsten Dominik's message of "Tue, 18 May 2010 06:47:45 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, "Tom Breton (Tehom)" Carsten Dominik writes: > On May 18, 2010, at 2:59 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote: > >> >> Hi, Carsten. The new changes are pushed as >> tehom-html-export-refactor-build-link >> >> I couldn't undo the basing onto tehom-master, try though I might. >> Something to do with intermediate changes that I couldn't fast-forward >> and that I probably edited wrong. So I made a separate branch, >> tehom-html-export-refactor-build-link, which is now pushed to the >> repo. So tehom-master and html-export-refactor-build-link are already >> obsolete. >> >> I moved the tests into top-level directory testing, as you asked. I'm >> going to write a separate post describing the test conventions I use. >> >> Now a question: IIUC you want a branch that has no tests, that >> "contains only the changes that would go into org". Since I develop >> tests and code at about the same time (tests slightly before code), >> I'm not sure how to arrange the branching in a maintainable way. > > Hi Tom, > > If we decide to use your emtests framework for Org on a brader basis, then there > would be no reason to have a branch free of tests. This is only necessary > because I am supposed to apply your patches, but without the testing framework > at the moment. > > Maybe we should just go ahead and start using emtest for Org-mode. Why don't > you go ahead and propose this in a mail to emacs-orgmode. Lets see if there is > any resistance by people who understand more about testing than I do. If not, > we go ahead and do it. We had that discussion here aleady, and the result is: we have no test framework to work with. Better just do it ;) Sebastian