From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Achim Gratz Subject: Re: Bounce: Bug in iCal export? Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2010 20:07:36 +0200 Message-ID: <871v963fvb.fsf@Rainer.invalid> References: <87bp8c116o.fsf@gnu.org> <87mxrwxaxv.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de> <87fwxovsy0.fsf@gnu.org> <87aanvor7b.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45640 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Osg6e-0005QV-0E for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2010 14:07:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Osg6c-0000jN-OV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2010 14:07:47 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:46198) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Osg6c-0000jC-IX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2010 14:07:46 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Osg6a-0003Gm-Bs for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2010 20:07:44 +0200 Received: from p57aaaa51.dip.t-dialin.net ([87.170.170.81]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 06 Sep 2010 20:07:44 +0200 Received: from Stromeko by p57aaaa51.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 06 Sep 2010 20:07:44 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Richard Riley writes: > Guy Wiener writes: > >> Do you mind sending a patch just for that? I prefer to check it >> without switching to the development release. > > Just an "FYI" : you can generate your own but clearly depends > on what version you are actually using. Besides, you can just cherry-pick the single commit in question into your local branch (I keep a local and a local-maint branch myself). If the changes were isolated enough, you wouldn't even get a merge conflict. This is best done with a GUI (I use gitk mostly), but it isn't too difficult to do it on the command line either. Achim.