From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Subject: Re: Re: Go to today in Calendar
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 17:39:55 +0100
Message-ID: <871v2ubvhg.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <AANLkTinVzO+=4+sXsQUTr3jz0q4rA189NHsE1p7k-H-X@mail.gmail.com>
	<801v2z9hwt.fsf@somewhere.org>
	<59F67FAE-5A63-4C44-B0B6-E36BE2323932@gmail.com>
	<80pqqgnodc.fsf@somewhere.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49771 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PtNBq-00066l-RM
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 11:40:23 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1PtNBl-0004KC-K2
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 11:40:18 -0500
Received: from mail-fx0-f41.google.com ([209.85.161.41]:49859)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1PtNBl-0004K8-DA
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 11:40:13 -0500
Received: by fxm5 with SMTP id 5so3089296fxm.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 08:40:12 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <80pqqgnodc.fsf@somewhere.org> (=?iso-8859-1?Q?=22S=E9bastien?=
	Vauban"'s message of "Fri, 25 Feb 2011 16:08:15 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien?= Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi Sébastien,

Sébastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com> writes:

> Is it because of some order to respect in the different allowed timestamps
> (active, inactive, scheduled, deadline) 

Yes, SCHEDULED (or DEADLINE) should come first.  In general, I tend to
avoid mixing several timestamps format for the same entry (I just allow
myself to use both SCHEDULED and DEADLINE, since that makes sense.)

HTH,

-- 
 Bastien