From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Matt Lundin <mdl@imapmail.org>
Subject: Re: Slow movement in large buffers
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 11:51:25 -0400
Message-ID: <871v28tm9u.fsf@fastmail.fm>
References: <87d3ltjc8x.fsf@fastmail.fm>
	<17242340-A14F-495A-B144-20C96D52B620@gmail.com>
	<7205.1300198547@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36790 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PzWX3-0007iS-6M
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 11:51:39 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lundin@fastmail.fm>) id 1PzWWw-0000xA-Jk
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 11:51:31 -0400
Received: from out5.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:35388)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lundin@fastmail.fm>) id 1PzWWw-0000wv-Dq
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 11:51:30 -0400
In-Reply-To: <7205.1300198547@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> (Nick Dokos's
	message of "Tue, 15 Mar 2011 10:15:47 -0400")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com
Cc: Org Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>

Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com> writes:

> FWIW, I opened org-issues.org and followed Matt's lead: at first, I got
> almost instant response going from Other to Closed (using arrow-down)
> and a slight hesitation (< 0.5s) going from Other to the previous
> headline (Development Tasks).  After noodling around for a while
> (including the motions that Eric F. suggested and getting no delays
> there), I tried it again and could discern no delay going either
> way. And I do run flyspell in org buffers.
>
> This is on a fairly recent vintage laptop with an i7 quad core processor
> (2.67GHz) and 4G of memory. That probably explains some of the difference
> I see. Matt, what kind of hardware are you using?

Yes, hardware is indeed a factor here. I'm using a dual-core Atom processor
with 2GB of memory.

Matt