From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [dev] footnotes improvements
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 12:04:14 +0200
Message-ID: <871v0444m9.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <871v05f4ca.fsf@gmail.com> <4DCB89FA.9080500@christianmoe.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60112)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1QKSl0-00017O-Hc
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2011 06:04:38 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1QKSkw-0002U0-JZ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2011 06:04:34 -0400
Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:43473)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1QKSkw-0002Tw-DP
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2011 06:04:30 -0400
Received: by wwb39 with SMTP id 39so1261805wwb.30
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 12 May 2011 03:04:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4DCB89FA.9080500@christianmoe.com> (Christian Moe's message of
	"Thu, 12 May 2011 09:19:22 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: mail@christianmoe.com
Cc: Org Mode List <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hello,

Christian Moe <mail@christianmoe.com> writes:

> * HTML: works!
>
> One question: As is, adjoining footnotes `2' and `3' read as `23'.
> Could/should the footnote export know to put a comma between
> them:`2,3'?
>
> For HTML purposes, I think not necessarily, the separator could be
> flexibly added with CSS like:
>
> : #+style: <style>sup + sup .footref:before {content: ", "}</style>

Probably, but I didn't change HTML exporter. I just made it compatible
with the changes applied to the LaTeX one.

>
> *  Latex: backtrace:
>

[...]

Oops I had commented (require footnote) to see what happened and forgot
to uncomment it again. This should be fixed now.

Thanks for testing this.


-- 
Nicolas Goaziou