From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: starting of parallel asynchronous shell processes
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 15:33:14 +0200
Message-ID: <871ujodrs5.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <loom.20120517T145957-51@post.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52608)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1SxHzg-0007FH-Sm
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 09:32:50 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1SxHzf-0003G4-Dt
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 09:32:44 -0400
Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:53157)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1SxHzf-0003Fu-7d
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 09:32:43 -0400
Received: by wgbez12 with SMTP id ez12so426328wgb.30
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 06:32:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <loom.20120517T145957-51@post.gmane.org> (Tobias Naehring's
	message of "Thu, 17 May 2012 13:01:59 +0000 (UTC)")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Tobias Naehring <i_inbox@tn-home.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi Tobias,

Tobias Naehring <i_inbox@tn-home.de> writes:

> A poor man's solution to allow parallel shell processes would be to replace the
> code fragment
>
> 		(progn
> 		  (message "Executing %s" cmd)
> 		  (shell-command cmd))
> 	      (error "Abort"))))
>
> from `org-open-at-point' by
>
> 		(progn
> 		  (message "Executing %s" cmd)
> 		  (shell-command cmd (generate-new-buffer "*org-shell-output")))
> 	      (error "Abort"))))

I've implement this poor man's solution.  The new buffers are added to
`clean-buffer-list-kill-buffer-names', and you can get rid of the
buffers with M-x clean-buffer-list RET.

Thanks for this idea,

-- 
 Bastien