From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Exporter interface question
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 22:10:27 +0100
Message-ID: <871uc0p2kc.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <DC6371D0-B65B-4BCE-8EDD-AFDE9ED812EB@gmail.com>
	<871uc2t9z7.fsf@gmail.com>
	<8993D674-E5E6-4B8E-AE3C-75F694371459@gmail.com>
	<8738whsrx3.fsf@gmail.com>
	<BE6C7742-48F1-4E2A-874F-8D528206FC7F@gmail.com>
	<87ip5cpwkx.fsf@gmail.com>
	<40E06D48-822F-4432-9D92-4F72AC866338@gmail.com>
	<87621cpqm5.fsf@gmail.com>
	<79ED4614-0209-4587-A8CE-343A7DBFAC3F@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48473)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1UBAkU-0000sP-ND
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 16:10:43 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1UBAkT-0005iP-O3
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 16:10:42 -0500
Received: from mail-we0-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::236]:38470)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1UBAkT-0005iG-Hh
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 16:10:41 -0500
Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id t57so1955515wey.13
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 13:10:40 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <79ED4614-0209-4587-A8CE-343A7DBFAC3F@gmail.com> (Carsten
	Dominik's message of "Thu, 28 Feb 2013 19:52:30 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>
Cc: Org-mode List <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> writes:

> On 28.2.2013, at 13:30, Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> writes:
>> 
>>> I agree, but I think then also setting the mark need to take care to
>>> set the mark in the base buffer. Will do this.
>> 
>> AFAICT, this is not necessary. Indirect buffers share markers with base
>> buffer.
>
> I think it is necessary.  If I move a marker to a position
> in a buffer and another marker to the same position in a connected
> indirect buffer, both markers are different and point to different
> buffers.  So if I start an export from an indirect buffer, the
> dispatch marker will point to the indirect buffer.  If I later
> compare the marker-buffer with (org-base-buffer (current-buffer)) I
> do get a mismatch.  So if you want to compare to org-base-buffer,
> I think I clearly need to set the marker to a position in the base
> buffer.

Then what about comparing base buffer for both entities?


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou