From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [bug] [new exporter] [markdown] Underline exports as HTML Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:17:20 +0100 Message-ID: <871ubjfhxb.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87txohh7uj.fsf@lapcat.tftorrey.com> <877gldwn74.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <20130312004205.GA74763@BigDog.local> <877glduknq.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40803) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UFnQx-0000cX-Ms for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 11:17:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UFnQo-0000cu-RB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 11:17:39 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::236]:38314) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UFnQo-0000cd-Kl for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 11:17:30 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id hi18so877011wib.3 for ; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 08:17:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <877glduknq.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (Bastien's message of "Tue, 12 Mar 2013 08:44:41 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: Rick Frankel , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Bastien writes: > Rick Frankel writes: > >> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:06:55AM +0100, Bastien wrote: >>> Hi Terry, >>> >>> tftorrey@tftorrey.com (T.F. Torrey) writes: >>> >>> > I'm not experienced with markdown, but this doesn't look right to >>> > me. >>> >> >>> AFAIK there is no syntax for underlining in Markdown, so underlined >>> text in Org will be exported as plain text in Markdown. >> >> I would argue that underlining is a form of emphasis, so the leading >> and trailing underscores should be passed through verbatim to >> markdown (which, in markdown syntax is an emphasized span). > > Yes, I see your point -- it's now the case. AFAIU, one Markdown feature is to accept raw HTML as part of the syntax. So, what's wrong in writing in HTML code anything that is not directly supported by Markdown syntax (like tables)? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou