From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: New exporter and dates in tables Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 16:01:08 +0200 Message-ID: <871uad5hzv.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87fvz1opiz.fsf@norang.ca> <8761zxwlvn.fsf@gmail.com> <87bo9pntym.fsf@norang.ca> <0604BF00-1FE8-4EAA-A346-C125A5127CAD@gmail.com> <877gkcvm3n.fsf@gmail.com> <173ADFE7-A1FB-4ECB-A78A-C99662A8030F@gmail.com> <87fvyysghk.fsf@gmail.com> <87bo9mh6ex.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87d2u1s3wf.fsf@gmail.com> <8738uxrrtc.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87mwt2aefz.fsf@gmail.com> <874nfa34vj.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87ehee9vz6.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip3p8mun.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87wqs58c7h.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip3p5ipz.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87ppxx8bs0.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33482) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1URNUZ-0005L4-CA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 10:01:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1URNUY-0005dm-DU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 10:01:15 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f45.google.com ([74.125.82.45]:51542) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1URNUY-0005cX-7J for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 10:01:14 -0400 Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id l18so3957260wgh.12 for ; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 07:01:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87ppxx8bs0.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Sun, 14 Apr 2013 15:47:11 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Bernt Hansen , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Carsten Dominik Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Then why do you suggest to drop the idea (for now)? Because IIUC, the time-stamps would not be ignored here * Task <2013-04-14 dim.> <2013-04-16 dim.> because <2013-04-14 dim.> <2013-04-16 dim.> is a paragraph. (The agenda takes both time-stamps into account in a simple `org-agenda-list'.) If we can remove the one-time-stamp only case, but not the case with two, it is too confusing IMHO. What do you think? -- Bastien