From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Leha Subject: Re: evaluation context in call statements Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 01:12:29 +0200 Message-ID: <871u7ni1wi.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> References: <444ea6cff489e2adc97092bdac881aef@mail.rickster.com> <878v1y574d.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <874ncm55ma.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87r4fq3ptf.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87ip11h2zq.fsf@gmail.com> <87fvw5fkpt.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87k3lgewrv.fsf@gmail.com> <87bo6sqhir.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87d2r8hy38.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> <87y59vr5ln.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52823) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UsLP9-0004g0-Hq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 19:15:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UsLP7-0006c6-V7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 19:15:07 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:60484) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UsLP7-0006bN-Oo for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 19:15:05 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UsLP5-0005Qs-LZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 01:15:03 +0200 Received: from vpn-2053.gwdg.de ([134.76.2.53]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 01:15:03 +0200 Received: from andreas.leha by vpn-2053.gwdg.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 01:15:03 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Achim Gratz writes: > Andreas Leha writes: >> I did not follow this tread, so I just wanted to clarify: You are talking >> about making me to replace >> >> #+call: number_of_sth(origin="dataset1") :results table >> #+call: number_of_sth(origin="dataset2") :results table >> >> with >> >> #+name: call_number_of_sth_with_origin_dataset1 >> #+call: number_of_sth(origin="dataset1") :results table >> #+name: call_number_of_sth_with_origin_dataset2 >> #+call: number_of_sth(origin="dataset2") :results table > > No. [...] Thanks for that reassuring clarification. - Andreas