From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Should comments break paragraphs? Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:44:32 +0200 Message-ID: <871u6yzyfj.fsf@gmail.com> References: <51E443F6.2050104@arfer.net> <87mwpnfybn.fsf@gmail.com> <51E47BC1.7010808@gmail.com> <87ip0byoqg.fsf@gmail.com> <87ehazymua.fsf@gmail.com> <87vc4a3oje.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53988) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uz0rs-00030o-Ot for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 04:44:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uz0rr-0000SU-Pq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 04:44:20 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::236]:35814) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uz0rr-0000SO-Ii for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 04:44:19 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id m6so370111wiv.3 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 01:44:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87vc4a3oje.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> (Andreas Leha's message of "Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:19:17 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Leha Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Andreas Leha writes: > In that case, I guess some confusion might come from LaTeX, for example, > where also the newline is ignored by the comment, s.t. in LaTeX > ,---- > | Some text > | % comment > | Some other text > `---- > is interpreted as > ,---- > | Some text > | Some other text > `---- Comparing Org and LaTeX is like comparing apples and oranges: it can only lead to false assumptions and cloud thinking. > IMO, there is no 'feature' in the 'paragraph breaking' comments in > org. But I understand that it is quite hard to change that behaviour. Just to be clear. I didn't talk about a "feature". I merely described the state of affairs, and added that, albeit not perfect, it seemed good enough to me. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou