From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug with :wrap when exporting
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 16:44:38 +0100
Message-ID: <871u1qugpl.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <m2k3fkbxec.fsf@polytechnique.org> <87eh5suu62.fsf@gmail.com>
	<m2haam3sho.fsf@polytechnique.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49267)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1VoxZo-0007OB-C4
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 10:44:29 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1VoxZi-00054y-RE
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 10:44:24 -0500
Received: from mail-wi0-x233.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::233]:39130)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1VoxZi-00054m-KE
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 10:44:18 -0500
Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id z2so1005890wiv.12
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 07:44:17 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <m2haam3sho.fsf@polytechnique.org> (Alan Schmitt's message of
	"Fri, 06 Dec 2013 16:32:19 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Alan Schmitt <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Alan Schmitt <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org> writes:

> Yes, it works great on the following example (which includes "direct
> printing", in the sense of echoing the #+BEGIN_SRC lines) as well as in
> the ":wrap" case.

Applied, then. Thank you for your feedback.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou