From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Erik Hetzner Subject: Re: Timestamps for a whole year, or a year and month Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 10:29:54 -0800 Message-ID: <871u0unqe5.wl%egh@e6h.org> References: <87txdrthy3.wl%egh@e6h.org> Reply-To: Erik Hetzner Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-7 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49716) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VxhbL-0002mL-ME for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2013 13:30:13 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VxhbG-0004U2-5E for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2013 13:30:07 -0500 Received: from mail-pd0-x22a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22a]:45722) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VxhbF-0004RN-Lf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2013 13:30:02 -0500 Received: by mail-pd0-f170.google.com with SMTP id g10so11581249pdj.15 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2013 10:30:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from michel.e6h.org (50-0-83-149.dsl.static.sonic.net. [50.0.83.149]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id oc9sm83178553pbb.10.2013.12.30.10.29.57 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 30 Dec 2013 10:29:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87txdrthy3.wl%egh@e6h.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org At Sun, 29 Dec 2013 14:23:32 -0800, Erik Hetzner wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > I am trying to get together a configuration for taking notes for > historical research using org mode. I think org mode could be very > useful for this, with its many ways of presenting, sorting and > searching information in orgmode files. >=20 > One thing that has me a bit stuck, though, is timestamps that might > represent a year. For instance, it would be nice to write: >=20 > By <1849> the California Gold Rush had ... Well, I think I=A2ve decided that my best bet here is to do the following: By 1849 <1849-01-01> the California Gold Rush had ... This preserves the information that we are talking about the year while giving me a time stamp I can use. Alternately one could use a drawer to hide this information, or put it in the headline. best, Erik --=20 Sent from my free software system .