From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: [RFC] Move ox-koma-letter into core? Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 11:47:51 +0100 Message-ID: <871tzf9p2g.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <878uueciku.fsf@gmail.com> <55F46D73-2430-4831-ABE9-D66AE03647E7@gmail.com> <874n50cdnu.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87fvo91ogy.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <874n4mevxx.fsf@gmail.com> <87iot26g40.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <878utn1a7q.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43077) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBiyi-0001os-2E for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 05:48:17 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBiyc-0007Zd-3x for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 05:48:12 -0500 Received: from rs249.mailgun.us ([209.61.151.249]:48743) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBiyb-0007ZZ-Vg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 05:48:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: <878utn1a7q.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Fri, 07 Feb 2014 11:35:53 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Alan Schmitt , Org Mode List , Carsten Dominik Hi, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Why this suggestion? To get Emacs core maintainers opinions on this and clarify if we can expand Org features at will or if they want to be control that somehow. > We recently introduced "ob-coq.el" in core without > asking Emacs maintainers beforehand. That's different: supporting as many programming languages is a core feature of Babel, while supporting as many export target as possible should not be a core feature of Emacs IMO, it should stay as a nice facility of the Org ecosystem. The second part of the paragraph above ("while...") is where I'd be interested to hear about what Emacs core maintainers think. If you're fine with this, I'll raise the topic on both emacs-devel and this list. -- Bastien