From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
To: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [patch] more robust footnotes
Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 18:50:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871t4q84k7.fsf@saiph.selenimh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8737p6fw0a.fsf@gmx.us> (rasmus@gmx.us's message of "Wed, 25 May 2016 09:16:05 +0200")
Hello,
Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:
> Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
>>
>> I suggest to avoid calling repeatedly
>> `org-export-get-footnote-definition'. Also, if the footnote reference is
>> anonymous, there is no point in calling `org-element-map'. The following
>> is more efficient:
>>
>> (format "\\footnote{%s%s}"
>> (org-trim (org-export-data def info))
>> ;; Only insert a label if there exist another reference to def.
>> (cond
>> ((not label) "")
>> ((org-element-map (plist-get info :parse-tree) 'footnote-reference
>> (lambda (f)
>> (and (not (eq f footnote-reference))
>> (equal (org-element-property :label f) label)
>> (org-latex--label def info t t)))
>> info t))
>> (t "")))
>
> Thanks.
>
> I have pushed the change.
Thank you.
However, the patch you committed doesn't short-circuit on anonymous
footnotes, per above (the (not label) part). As a consequence, every
anonymous footnote (as long as there is more than one) gets a label,
AFAICT.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-25 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-23 20:54 Bug: When exporting to PDF an Org file where multiple footnotes share the same definition, only the first footnote is clickable [8.3.4 (8.3.4-39-ge0acd8-elpaplus @ /home/jorge/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20160418/)] Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto
2016-04-25 8:38 ` Rasmus
2016-04-25 8:58 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2016-04-25 10:53 ` Rasmus
2016-04-25 11:41 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2016-04-25 13:36 ` Rasmus
2016-04-25 13:57 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2016-04-25 14:04 ` Rasmus
2016-04-25 14:07 ` Rasmus
2016-05-22 20:16 ` Rasmus
2016-05-23 21:41 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2016-05-24 20:59 ` [patch] more robust footnotes (was: Bug: When exporting to PDF an Org file where multiple footnotes share the same definition, only the first footnote is clickable [8.3.4 (8.3.4-39-ge0acd8-elpaplus @ /home/jorge/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20160418/)]) Rasmus
2016-05-24 21:31 ` [patch] more robust footnotes Nicolas Goaziou
2016-05-24 21:38 ` Rasmus
2016-05-24 21:54 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2016-05-25 7:16 ` Rasmus
2016-05-25 16:50 ` Nicolas Goaziou [this message]
2016-05-25 17:51 ` Rasmus
2016-08-10 21:09 ` Bug: When exporting to PDF an Org file where multiple footnotes share the same definition, only the first footnote is clickable [8.3.4 (8.3.4-39-ge0acd8-elpaplus @ /home/jorge/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20160418/)] Kaushal Modi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871t4q84k7.fsf@saiph.selenimh \
--to=mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=rasmus@gmx.us \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).