From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: Allowing multiple date trees in a single file
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 18:50:25 +0100
Message-ID: <871sw1zice.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <CADn3Z2JH5VJ-4c5kxfgKE8DmQA9PeFpqBch1FOV0Xfq7PXtDTQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<87wpdv4fdq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<CADn3Z2JzY3HxgKRX6BcoayNssMtY_CfsV5A9qYRvxSM3FXaiZA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48030)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1cTXu0-0004uy-9S
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 12:50:37 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1cTXtz-0006Z3-DY
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 12:50:36 -0500
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:40795)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>)
	id 1cTXty-0006Xw-1g
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 12:50:34 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CADn3Z2JzY3HxgKRX6BcoayNssMtY_CfsV5A9qYRvxSM3FXaiZA@mail.gmail.com>
	(Carsten Dominik's message of "Tue, 17 Jan 2017 13:19:56 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Carsten Dominik <dominik@uva.nl>
Cc: org-mode list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hello,

Carsten Dominik <dominik@uva.nl> writes:

> Another way to implement this would be to use different VALUES for the
> DATE_TREE/WEEK_TREE property - maybe that would actually be a somewhat
> cleaner implementation.

I think ":DATE_TREE: week" ":DATE_TREE: t" is cleaner, indeed.

> I'll rethink that and I will also define a test.

I also agree there's an opportunity to refactor this and come out with
a more generic interface.

Yet another option is to define new capture targets, e.g.

 - file+datetree+olp
 - file+datetree+olp+date
 - file+datetree+regexp
 - file+datetree+regexp+date
 - ...
 - file+weektree+olp
 - ...

Those would ignore WEEK_TREE and DATE_TREE properties altogether.

Regards,


-- 
Nicolas Goaziou