From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Heads-up: test failures Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:26:29 -0500 Message-ID: <871sv0e7e2.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> References: <87d1emexl3.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> <84tw7xj32y.fsf@tm6592> <87d1elltjb.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <8760kdg5id.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> <878tp9yz20.fsf@yandex.com> <87r330elih.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> <8737fgqx7b.fsf@yandex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33019) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdlYU-0003Lf-FW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:26:39 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdlYT-0000Fx-7a for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:26:38 -0500 Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=54142 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdlYT-0000Fs-0Q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:26:37 -0500 Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cdlYK-00028z-G9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 23:26:28 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Colin Baxter writes: > On Tue, Feb 14 2017, Nick Dokos wrote: > >> Colin Baxter writes: >> >>> On Mon, Feb 13 2017, Nick Dokos wrote: >>> >>>> Nicolas Goaziou writes: >>>> >>>>> What is the failure in each case? >>>> >>> ---- snip ---- >>> >>> Ran 711 tests, 711 results as expected (2017-02-14 07:58:32+0000) >>> 8 expected failures >>> >>> org-mode release_9.0.5-282-g2e32709 >>> emacs-25.1.1; 3.2.0-4-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 3.2.84-1 i686 GNU/Linux >>> >>> >> >> It might be that emacs 26 shows the failures (both Marco Wahl and I are >> running that, but Colin Baxter runs emacs 25 and does not see them). > > > Unfortunately, the tests pass using emacs-26 too: > > Ran 711 tests, 711 results as expected (2017-02-14 21:21:38+0000) > 8 expected failures > > org-version: 9.0.5 (release_9.0.5-288-g4caad0) > GNU Emacs 26.0.50.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.4.2) of 2017-02-11 > > Well, I'm running 26.0.50.2, so there is still a possible out. But Marco Wahl is running 26.0.50.1, so there goes that theory :-) I usually run a shell within emacs and I ran `make test' from there earlier. I tried doing a `make test' from a shell in an `emacs -q' and also just from a plain xterm: I still get the four failures. -- Nick