Re: [PATCH] may we focus on readability?

[Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>]

Hello,

Mario Frasca <mario@anche.no> writes:

> I'm rewriting a complicated construction where there's an equality
> test on the length of the list of non matching elements, with a
> simpler cl-some invocation.  The replacing code is self explanatory.
>
> Subject: [PATCH] lisp/org-plot.el: reducing complexity of test.
>
> * lisp/org-plot.el (org-plot/gnuplot): readability of test, looking
> for some non satisfying elements.
>
> I'm rewriting a complicated construction where there's an equality
> test on the length of the list of non matching elements, with a
> simpler cl-some invocation.  The replacing code is self explanatory.
> ---
>  lisp/org-plot.el | 19 ++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lisp/org-plot.el b/lisp/org-plot.el
> index a23195d2a..f50ad09a9 100644
> --- a/lisp/org-plot.el
> +++ b/lisp/org-plot.el
> @@ -312,22 +312,15 @@ line directly before or after the table."
>        ;; Check for timestamp ind column.
>        (let ((ind (1- (plist-get params :ind))))
>  	(when (and (>= ind 0) (eq '2d (plist-get params :plot-type)))
> -	  (if (= (length
> -		  (delq 0 (mapcar
> -			   (lambda (el)
> -			     (if (string-match org-ts-regexp3 el) 0 1))
> -			   (mapcar (lambda (row) (nth ind row)) table))))
> -		 0)
> +	  (if (cl-some (lambda (el)
> +			 (not (string-match org-ts-regexp3 el)))
> +		       (mapcar (lambda (row) (nth ind row)) table))
>  	      (plist-put params :timeind t)
>  	    ;; Check for text ind column.
>  	    (if (or (string= (plist-get params :with) "hist")
> -		    (> (length
> -			(delq 0 (mapcar
> -				 (lambda (el)
> -				   (if (string-match org-table-number-regexp el)
> -				       0 1))
> -				 (mapcar (lambda (row) (nth ind row)) table))))
> -		       0))
> +		    (cl-some (lambda (el)
> +			       (not (string-match org-table-number-regexp el)))
> +			     (mapcar (lambda (row) (nth ind row)) table))))
>  		(plist-put params :textind t)))))
>        ;; Write script.
>        (with-temp-buffer

OK. Note you can go even further: nested `if' should be replaced with
a `cond'.

Also, further nit: (not (cl-every ...)) will apply `not' only once.

In any case, it would be better if refactoring happens while introducing
unit tests *hint*.

Regards,
-- 
Nicolas Goaziou