Re: [tip for EXWM users] An alternative method for isolate trees

[Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com>]

Julian M. Burgos writes:

> I have not noticed that org-tree-to-indirect-buffer
> reuses the indirect buffer when you call it for a second time.
> According to the manual, "with a C-u prefix, do not remove the
> previously used indirect buffer", but that does not seem to work.
> When you do Cu-Cc-Cx-b from a buffer that already has an indirect
> buffer you get a "cannot modify an area being edited in a dedicated
> buffer".  If you try it from a different buffer, the prefix is ignored
> and the indirect buffer is assigned to the tree from the last buffer.

Hmm, could you provide a reproducer for the problem?  Here's what I
tried with the current master (afd75d05a), Emacs 27.1, and no custom
configuration.

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
* a
a content
* b
b content
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

 - on "a", C-c C-x b  ;; org-tree-to-indirect-buffer
   Displays <file>-a-1 buffer.

 - move to "b", C-u C-c C-x b
   Displays <file>-b-1 buffer, a-1 buffer still exists.