From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:1008:1e59::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms1.migadu.com with LMTPS id eCL2FHzRYGbufAEAA41jLg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 05 Jun 2024 22:58:36 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id AL2/D3zRYGbEXQAA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 05 Jun 2024 22:58:36 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=YdnSsM5X; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1717621116; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=XCN4Pbnhpe+YUIjGVdFc46rXwKKGy2xLBW2+5DjTlC8=; b=OHeo801p9qheoUuv5Zo27kfCqYeOnWUxnDyQw9eIz8XvMZJHv1UICLXr5LTc+HEwMw+i0A xi3BUAMeca2ryBEjZ7HaLhSTbXs+SdQarwWiqwNtpcsCxqDLy8xvVnrbmQwqPkqQIsc7un v28Gp5PGW78LTFPItqEZ9U1KXODQeHH3srnfa1ESxjsURNZ/haH+KLjQ5Q/u2hF/LWe8yl hsfx+ksfhj7zfAzY8rJiYyvDH7OSIY+uyun0eDXnep6tsqSICIZvDCxa3jDVv5/PmLD8yN kunnYUSkbd532LPq8xma2xjF6U4tjPMSoU1RPh4J2P3MJAIGxtORjAVuPomKbQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=YdnSsM5X; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1717621116; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=D9g8TB5wpGgWzTzaDLNWm7Y3Ci74km1VaXALqfuLNMq9Mmr8vNugjDdSNDwXTZPhXkChCT Je79FS8rLvCpAQ/+E5fjXZPYkaBMjbxQHv9C7cl9FBWjvsNUxVR9xOi+qcv2Ks2rQKvfcz tdXkrG9ivEiXUuLcJath1Ts5GNOMa9gZuE9bFBPlyQH2zDJMMVtkxC+/Fb3cSBgYRZxCIA utQtu4q6kCcf3nkgKW2+sK4qAO95g4C3duTWsNMS2qkfD93BLpgHHy7DIRc74K48cKbGEx eWofOPjsfh/jcu1tJmJL3B1Ug0XHQfvutEk96dVq61jq3K2OMcxqO/3PneA5mg== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B83BF753B8 for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:58:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sExBN-0007Rj-1c; Wed, 05 Jun 2024 16:24:29 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sExBL-0007Ra-DO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jun 2024 16:24:27 -0400 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sExBI-0007yb-OQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jun 2024 16:24:27 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27C9D240027 for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:24:19 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1717619059; bh=DU7jfl+kqBBbnjTA7WlKLrsetpIRet+bxQ55MKsD1nY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: From; b=YdnSsM5X6UtwMU4unJZvvB4zb7PKsZAEokKIgN1SLvIvE8ToStG2amNrZrnaf+y91 tKQZfqTmRlQ0Pzl2VV0/quA9QFgCBKIM5wkZFuhF4HGbdmQmS1WK8g5p7xyEc4SC6P /E+y/xCLuLzH5p6i5nKTWbU4pV+CXvfNFNqYEOSEeQb+Ozb1DJgVLZnVo7+X14bjsA 8D7RPJphfdZx529DWiMAe37SjCq5DDR8DofA/VZfQZaH84EFVNA0YZKBQTPNk5Btyw 7bx8K5YhZ5RaTtE+J7plgKaT0zHROuEHldJcFhuFYPdYuvM0V9vO5Si+7zAT/mbx4q FoAKIaSoFACIQ== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4Vvf7k3KpLz6tw3; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:24:18 +0200 (CEST) From: Ihor Radchenko To: Suhail Singh Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Subject: Re: [BUG] org-lint: Spurious warning by 'suspicious-language-in-src-block [9.7.2 (release_N/A-N/A-88dd2c @ /home/user/.emacs.d/elpa/org-9.7.2/)] In-Reply-To: <87y17jji26.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87mso035kq.fsf@gmail.com> <87cyov7d2c.fsf@localhost> <874ja7ik7h.fsf@gmail.com> <87msnz5sp9.fsf@localhost> <87wmn3gyv6.fsf@gmail.com> <874ja75i6q.fsf@localhost> <87y17jji26.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2024 20:25:56 +0000 Message-ID: <871q5b5e7f.fsf@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Spam-Score: -7.99 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: B83BF753B8 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -7.99 X-TUID: bXTU45xFUM0n Suhail Singh writes: > Ihor Radchenko writes: > >> This would work, but it modifies the checker list destructively. > > Yes, as does org-lint-add-checker. In the same vein, > org-lint-remove-checker is intended to be able to undo the "effect" of > one or more org-lint-add-checker invocations. Indeed. But I wanted to nudge you to do a bit better :) >> What about introducing some kind of selector variable instead? > > That could also work; there is more than one way to achieve the end. > However, I am not convinced that it's the "better" approach. It's > altering an existing API for, what I deem to be, little value. A new custom variable is not altering the existing API, it is extending it. The extension is also not entirely out of nowhere - `org-lint' already accepts a list of checkers as an argument. Further, the distant goal is to implement integration of org-lint into flycheck/flymake. And we do need user-level config for which checkers should be enabled for "full" org-lint check and for "quick" check on the fly then. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at