From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id yJo8AdGYjmfySgEAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 18:41:21 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id yJo8AdGYjmfySgEAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 19:41:21 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b="W/tmRNzI"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1737398480; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=ReoW33Rv/ndWMIi2OFhRAeHZXV35+c8jNVDfZICtcn8=; b=OA5gN45s9BtvmeCg+8OnL19o35Qly/IYYNwnPWO9XZC3B3SzMvah0fpIxcROP/p7xexnnu b31zony10vig2/ZwxrMvU++eWcPImwzzX6n5d/BDOf5lO57tMKGAre4Erw95wnbGCS3eZ9 xzBzN2DPbFbWLSeTaIn9wLkjkpPFuBqcaOTQAC1F+5ygS9IqWZc4rm3qwugzRy34Jh8Kii JxVFUuesxdP1odcUU2oHVmYiVc6TIShmQGFsKzsLJ2VpiQXYThWOxFpXJWATJW96YN5k2A k3NhZQt7cUAZsvSNjHPwnN4nbNqYjLxTLuzvTGqGzAdJEnq3AB3zO6aSyVVuAg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b="W/tmRNzI"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1737398480; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=rhM7FDLhwwQP47TEXA2PXEwjiKJUWJqMlEY1c/Euidyeew0okdSi5ZvJ664WU+k6PFAsJR 7ikxAeT9rF4dJF0/OOKuqPO0vvTKdgr7Ln0GNsvIQWJM+LkKWBGsy+cLPTVvs2yZDud44b q1d6ClgrkukHRufDMGvhlxcvm923mZNxfBzAxiKFjzDzCXSp40puqM79NIl3OAsaODT1vV VMrKwG3Gru0YMQx2wwze+DstUInvp3JAH5Mua9tHdIZROmWkfIboAXVAiJfiNXIGeqBJgB S+VBneTxr8Q+kcC4P4kdYiYGUdUhdidnDOC1GSiuIL58UZkqq1OExfjesev5gA== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8756E8D30D for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 19:41:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tZwhB-000487-2r; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 13:40:21 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tZwh9-00047r-Ry for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 13:40:19 -0500 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tZwh5-0007h5-8v for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 13:40:19 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B29BB240027 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 19:40:10 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1737398410; bh=cuwMj8pVVkmPH8/d4TxgJL6Z3hX9+tH0+x9KaVAXlwM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: From; b=W/tmRNzIJ27OxDlfJZZfRYx3Lc7VuEZCTuLyz8Vx+sDUHsnh+AS105UmqaqAdmX1n zeFCBYdB5GdGoMcNz/aiAp062Frz8MHG9ia8pvZlTUjotPSa1UIJtWgwb7QXY0BIjp 3Rv0nmvyJxy4nADsqF77Ah/s8Tts8bGt8VWHotnegI2L0D/O1vzhIjEtL2cMTfmfCr 7CAkH2gOJ1HpGTdPWvBrSlYRd4WAbExHeImyXt2Ug1ORZkBnoU06qt4LkMk0VBH6k2 vWNnkoa8LnhrSW6cFT2fcUcq2KtTEu4nIXsT+UwXfqU1WJAw4Vs1QscimjR8WK5G21 wH4yLYl9On+vA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4YcJzt17zZz9rxG; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 19:40:10 +0100 (CET) From: Ihor Radchenko To: Torben Knudsen Cc: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" Subject: Re: [BUG] Warning (org-element): org-element--cache: Org parser error in Tmp.org::47694. Resetting. [9.7.18 (9.7.18-1463ab @ /home/tk/.emacs.d/elpa/org-9.7.18/)] In-Reply-To: References: <87v7ucr38v.fsf@localhost> Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 18:42:27 +0000 Message-ID: <871pwxs4x8.fsf@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Scanner: mx11.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.99 X-Spam-Score: -4.99 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 8756E8D30D X-TUID: SL6Jyh6ZfieD Torben Knudsen writes: > Once I newer received any errors but since the last year or so I have received some but not a lot and I newer seen any effect of them. Maybe it is since I had ubuntu 24.04. These warnings were introduced in Org 9.6, when we switched on parser cache by default. That code is fragile, so it has self-recovery mechanism when something goes wrong. The warnings you are seeing indicate that something went wrong, and the cache was dropped (for safety). These errors are usually harmless (in practice), although, in theory, they may sometimes lead to text in buffer edited wrongly (for example, SCHEDULE: marker put in wrong position). Users who see these warnings often may have specific workflows that expose bugs in our code, and we usually ask such users to enable cache logging mechanisms. Not you though - if you do not see the warnings often, we cannot record a useful (and not insanely long) log. Your bug report is an indication that problems still do exist in this area (alas). So, thanks for reporting! Closing this bug for now as debugging is not possible. Canceled. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode maintainer, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at