From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniele Pizzolli <dan@toel.it>
Subject: Re: [BUG] babel eval of emacs-lisp: orgtbl-to-orgtbl: Wrong type
 argument: listp, t
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 20:30:29 +0100
Message-ID: <86y4noh1d6.fsf@me.localhost.invalid>
References: <86lhjossj6.fsf@me.localhost.invalid>
	<m2bnkk9453.fsf@andrew.cmu.edu> <867fv8sr6v.fsf@me.localhost.invalid>
	<m2a904iqfp.fsf@andrew.cmu.edu> <87d2505xn4.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58514)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <dan@toel.it>)
	id 1YPyiC-0005cf-7N
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 14:30:37 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <dan@toel.it>) id 1YPyi8-0003Ql-Mc
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 14:30:36 -0500
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:53665)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <dan@toel.it>)
	id 1YPyi8-0003QU-Ho
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 14:30:32 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87d2505xn4.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of
	"Mon, 23 Feb 2015 18:46:23 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, John Kitchin <jkitchin@andrew.cmu.edu>

Nicolas Goaziou writes:

> Hello,

[]

> Indeed. This should be fixed in
> ad7b7efcdc2e0803cbf0257bb2588c8e8e1cac29.
>
> If fall-backs to a plain string.
>
> Thank you.

Thanks to you for taking care so quickly!

Best,
Daniele