From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Sebastien Vauban" Subject: Re: Behavior of M-q on comments in code blocks Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 16:32:09 +0100 Message-ID: <86wqh9a83q.fsf@somewhere.org> References: <86fvnxg7o9.fsf@somewhere.org> <87r47hahnq.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <86a9e5bqh5.fsf@somewhere.org> <87txcdmvho.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Bastien wrote: > "Sebastien Vauban" writes: > >> I just type M-q on the comment line and the lines are completely mixed >> up: > > Actually M-q in shell-mode on the "echo ..." line will produce the > problem. So I think you should first report this as an Emacs bug. True for `M-q' on the second line (echo line) -- did know about that. I'll report it. Though, when doing it on the first line (comment), we don't have the same behavior whether the `M-q' is done on the code block itself (in the Org file) or in the indirect buffer: while the first fails, the latter does work as expected. See http://screencast.com/t/iwE7xbxKj. Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban